App updated Dec, 2016


Endangered Species Act consultation explorer

Selection criteria

Select your favorite state, species, work type, lead agency, and formal vs. informal consultations from drop-downs at left; graphs and maps will update automatically. You may select more than one category to filter on. For example, if you're just interested in bull trout in Idaho and for projects involving the Forest Service, then you may select each of those criteria (or any others as you see fit).



Click the + in the box below to reveal additional selectors.

Additional selectors

These additional selectors may be useful for digging deeper into the section 7 data.

Total # consultations

Number formal consultations

Median days to approval (all)

Median days to approval (formal)

Consultations by fiscal year

Consultations by state
Five New England states and parts of Iowa and Illinois are each covered by a single FWS office. See table for consultation counts of these groups of states.

Consultations by work category (top 20)

Consultation duration

The full range of duration values is trimmed to make the graph more readable. Note that long duration (>135 days) may be caused by consultation reinitiation (see Sec. 7 background page) rather than a single, long-running consultation.

Consultations by agency (top 25)

Agencies in the database may include either the federal action agency or the applicant. The plotted values are therefore lower limits to the number of consultations by federal agencies.

Consultations by species (top 50)











App updated Dec, 2016




Endangered Species Act consultation explorer

Compare two selections

Selection #1

Selection #2





vs.



Additional selectors

Selection #1

Selection #2

Selection #1

Selection #2

Total no. consultations

Number formal consultations

Total no. consultations

Number formal consultations

Median days to approval (all)

Median days to approval (formal)

Median days to approval (all)

Median days to approval (formal)

Consultations through time: Selection 1

Consultations through time: Selection 2

Consultations by state: Selection 1
Five New England states and parts of Iowa and Illinois are each covered by a single FWS office. See table for consultation counts of these groups of states.

Consultations by state: Selection 2
Five New England states and parts of Iowa and Illinois are each covered by a single FWS office. See table for consultation counts of these groups of states.

Consultations by species (top 25): Selection 1

Consultations by species (top 25): Selection 2

Consultation duration: Selection 1

The full range of duration values is trimmed to make the graph more readable. Note that long duration (>135 days) may be caused by consultation reinitiation (see Sec. 7 background page) rather than a single, long-running consultation.

Consultation duration: Selection 2

The full range of duration values is trimmed to make the graph more readable. Note that long duration (>135 days) may be caused by consultation reinitiation (see Sec. 7 background page) rather than a single, long-running consultation.

Consultations by work category: Selection 1

Consultations by work category: Selection 2

Consultations by agency: Selection 1

Consultations by agency: Selection 2








Endangered Species Act consultation explorer: FWS Office Map

Selection criteria

Select your favorite state, species, work type, lead agency, and formal vs. informal consultations from drop-downs at left; graphs and maps will update automatically. You may select more than one category to filter on. For example, if you're just interested in bull trout in Idaho and for projects involving the Forest Service, then you may select each of those criteria (or any others as you see fit).



Click the + on the right in the box below to reveal additional selectors.

Additional selectors

These additional selectors may be useful for digging deeper into the section 7 data.

Consultations by ES Office

Data shown is based on selection criteria. A small number of ES Offices are not shown because of office name changes. Office boundaries are close approximations of FWS coverage areas. Hovering over the map for ~1 sec. or clicking the the map will enable zooming with mouse scroll. Moving the mouse outside of the map will disable zoom-by-scroll.



Selected data


Download (tab-sep.) Download metadata




Section 7 Overview

In 1973 the United States Congress passed, and President Nixon signed into law, the Endangered Species Act (Act) in response to the threat of extinction for many of the nation’s species. The Act remains the premier law for preventing the extinction of imperiled species: extinction has been avoided thus far for 99% of >1600 domestic listed species (CITE). Section 7 of the Act expands the role of federal agencies in conserving listed species beyond the agencies with primary responsibility (Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS] and National Marine Fisheries Service [NMFS]):

Each Federal agency shall, in consultation with [FWS and NMFS], insure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by such agency [action agency]…is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat of such species…

The process captured in this directive is commonly referred to as “section 7 consultation” (see diagram below).

Section 7 is considered by many to be the most important section of the Act. In addition to federal agencies, many non-federal entities–including private businesses and state and local governments–actively seek a 'federal nexus' for their projects as a means of obtaining Incidental Take Permits (ITPs; see Glossary, right) for listed species. Alternative approaches to obtaining ITPs include Habitat Conservation Plans and Safe Harbor Agreements, but both of these take more time to complete than direct section 7 consultation.

Consultation Process (simplified)

Section 7 Glossary

Action agency

A federal agency that proposes an action which may affect a listed species or its designated critical habitat, requiring the agency to undergo the process of ESA section 7 consultations.

Adverse modification of critical habitat

An alteration in a species’ critical habitat that negatively impacts the survival and recovery of the listed species.

Biological Opinion

A document that includes the official statement from the Federal service(s) as to whether the action in question will jeopardize a listed species or its designated critical habitat based on the best available science. Biological Opinions must include an incidental take statement (ITS).

Concurrence

During the informal consultation process, if efforts are made to eliminate the potential negative effects of the proposed action, the Services will concur in writing that the action is not likely to adversely affect listed species or designated critical habitat.

Consultation

A process designed to assist Federal agencies in fulfilling the requirement to “further the conservation of listed species”, as detailed under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. The consultation process requires Federal agencies to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service to ensure that Federal agencies are not engaging in activities that jeopardize a listed species or its designated critical habitat.

Consultation reinitiation

A Biological Opinion will stipulate conditions under which a completed consultation will need to be reinitated, e.g., if the scope of a project changes significantly. FWS will then perform a new biological analysis based on the updated information, and issue a new Biological Opinion and Incidental Take Permit. There is no field in the TAILS database to indicate if a record is a reinitiation, but the title of the consultation may indicate reinitiation.

Critical habitat

A specific geographic area containing physical or biological features that are essential to a listed species’ conservation, as defined under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act. Critical habitat may include areas currently inhabited by the species or those that are uninhabited but will be needed for the species’ recovery.

Endangered species

Any species listed as being in danger of extinction throughout a portion of its range.

Endangered Species Act (ESA)

An environmental law passed in 1973 intended to protect and recover imperiled species and the ecosystems on which they depend.

Endangered Species Committee (“God Squad”)

A committee with the ability to exempt a federal agency from the section 7 consultation requirements, created through the 1978 amendments to the ESA. The committee is composed of seven Cabinet-level members: The administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the administrator of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, a representative from the state in question, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of the Army, and the Secretary of the Interior.

Formal consultation

A formal process between the Services and an action agency that determines whether a proposed action will jeopardize a listed species or adversely modify any critical habitat. The formal consultation process includes a biological opinion issued by the Service detailing the effects of the proposed action.

FWS

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service

Incidental Take

Any harm to a listed species that results from, but is not the intended purpose of, an action conducted by a federal agency.

Incidental Take Statement (ITS)

A statement detailing the extent of any incidental take resulting from the proposed action.

Informal consultation

A process that includes discussion and correspondence between an action agency and the Services to determine whether a proposed action will affect a listed species or their critical habitat. If the action is likely to adversely affect a listed species or critical habitat, a formal consultation is needed.

Jeopardy

A conclusion of jeopardy is warranted if a federal action as proposed is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of an affected species.

Likely to adversely affect

The appropriate conclusion if the proposed action poses any adverse threat to a listed species or critical habitat. A 'likely to adversely affect' conclusion requires the action agency and the Services to undergo a formal consultation to determine whether a listed species will be jeopardized by the action or any adverse modification of critical habitat will occur as a result of the action.

May affect

A 'may affect' conclusion is reached when the proposed action may pose any affect to a listed species or critical habitat. Under a 'may affect' conclusion, the action agency must either undergo a formal consultation or obtain concurrence that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect the species or critical habitat.

NMFS

The National Marine Fisheries Service

No effect

The proposed action will not affect any endangered species or their designated critical habitat and is not required to undergo the formal consultation process.

Not likely to adversely affect

The conclusion reached when the effects of a proposed action are likely to be insignificant, discountable or beneficial to listed species or critical habitat.

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Any alternative actions recommended by the Services during a formal consultation that would avoid the likelihood of jeopardizing a species or critical habitat while maintaining the original scope and purpose of the originally proposed action.

Reasonable and Prudent Measures (RPMs)

Measures taken to minimize the amount or extent of any incidental take incurred by the action.

Service(s)

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service

Take

To 'to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect or attempt to engage in any such conduct' in regards to a listed species, as detailed under section 9 of the ESA. “Harm” is further defined as 'an act which actually kills or injures wildlife. Such an act may include significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, or sheltering.'